ETHICS HISTORICAL ACCOUNT

Ethics

I

INTRODUCTION

Ethics (Greek ethika, from ethos, “character,” “custom”), principles or standards of human conduct, sometimes called morals (Latin mores, “customs”), and, by extension, the study of such principles, sometimes called moral philosophy. This article is concerned with ethics chiefly in the latter sense and is confined to that of Western civilization, although every culture has developed an ethic of its own.

Ethics, as a branch of philosophy, is considered a normative science, because it is concerned with norms of human conduct, as distinguished from the formal sciences, such as mathematics and logic, and the empirical sciences, such as chemistry and physics. The empirical social sciences, however, including psychology, impinge to some extent on the concerns of ethics in that they study social behavior. For example, the social sciences frequently attempt to determine the relation of particular ethical principles to social behavior and to investigate the cultural conditions that contribute to the formation of such principles.

II

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES

Philosophers have attempted to determine goodness in conduct according to two chief principles, and have considered certain types of conduct either good in themselves or good because they conform to a particular moral standard. The former implies a final value, or summum bonum, which is desirable in itself and not merely as a means to an end. In the history of ethics there are three principal standards of conduct, each of which has been proposed as the highest good: happiness or pleasure; duty, virtue, or obligation; and perfection, the fullest harmonious development of human potential.

Depending on the social setting, the authority invoked for good conduct is the will of a deity, the pattern of nature, or the rule of reason. When the will of a deity is the authority, obedience to the divine commandments in scriptural texts is the accepted standard of conduct. If the pattern of nature is the authority, conformity to the qualities attributed to human nature is the standard. When reason rules, behavior is expected to result from rational thought.

III

PRUDENCE, PLEASURE, OR POWER

Sometimes principles are chosen whose ultimate value is not determined, in the belief that such a determination is impossible. Such ethical philosophy usually equates satisfaction in life with prudence, pleasure, or power, but it is basically derived from belief in the ethical doctrine of natural human fulfillment as the ultimate good.

A person lacking motivation to exercise preference may be resigned to accepting all customs and therefore may develop a philosophy of prudence. He or she then lives in conformity with the moral conduct of the period and society.

Hedonism is that philosophy in which the highest good is pleasure. The hedonist decides between the most enduring pleasures or the most intense pleasures, whether present pleasures should be denied for the sake of overall comfort, and whether mental pleasures are preferable to physical pleasures.

A philosophy in which the highest attainment is power may result from competition. Because each victory tends to raise the level of the competition, the logical end of such a philosophy is unlimited or absolute power. Power seekers may not accept customary ethical rules but may conform to other rules that can help them become successful. They will seek to persuade others that they are moral in the accepted sense of the term in order to mask their power motives and to gain the ordinary rewards of morality.

IV

HISTORY

For as long as people have been living together in groups, the moral regulation of behavior has been necessary to the group's well-being. Although the morals were formalized and made into arbitrary standards of conduct, they developed, sometimes irrationally, after religious taboos were violated, or out of chance behavior that became habit and then custom, or from laws imposed by chiefs to prevent disharmony in their tribes. Even the great ancient Egyptian and Sumerian civilizations developed no systematized ethics; maxims and precepts set down by secular leaders, such as Ptahhotep, mingled with a strict religion that affected the behavior of every Egyptian. In ancient China the maxims of Confucius were accepted as a moral code. The Greek philosophers, beginning about the 6th century bc, theorized intensively about moral behavior, which led to the further development of philosophical ethics.

V

EARLY GREEK ETHICS

In the 6th century bc the Greek philosopher Pythagoras developed one of the earliest moral philosophies from the Greek mystery religion Orphism. Believing that the intellectual nature is superior to the sensual nature and that the best life is one devoted to mental discipline, he founded a semireligious order with rules emphasizing simplicity in speech, dress, and food. The members observed rituals that were designed to demonstrate the decreed ethical beliefs.

In the 5th century bc the Greek philosophers known as Sophists, who taught rhetoric, logic, and civil affairs, were skeptical of moral absolutes. The Sophist Protagoras taught that human judgment is subjective, and that one's perception is valid only for oneself. The Sophist Gorgias went to the extreme of arguing that nothing exists; that if anything does exist, human beings could not know it; and that if they did know it, they could not communicate that knowledge. Other Sophists, such as Thrasymachus, believed that might makes right. Socrates opposed the Sophists. His philosophical position, as represented in the dialogues of his pupil Plato, may be summarized as follows: virtue is knowledge; people will be virtuous if they know what virtue is; and vice, or evil, is the result of ignorance. Thus, according to Socrates, education can make people moral.

VI

GREEK SCHOOLS OF ETHICS

Most later Greek schools of moral philosophy were derived from the teachings of Socrates. Four such schools originated among his immediate disciples: the Cynics, the Cyrenaics, the Megarians (a school founded by Euclid of Megara), and the Platonists.

The Cynics, notably the philosopher Antisthenes, maintained that the essence of virtue, the only good, is self-control and that it is capable of being taught. The Cynics disdained pleasure as an evil, if accepted as a guide to conduct. They considered all pride a vice, including pride in appearance or cleanliness. Socrates is reputed to have said to Antisthenes, “I can see your pride through the holes in your cloak.”

The Cyrenaics, notably Aristippus of Cyrene, were hedonists, postulating pleasure as the chief good (as long as it does not dominate one's life), that no one kind of pleasure is superior to another, and that it is measurable only in degree and duration.

The Megarians, Euclid's followers, posited that although good may be called wisdom, God, or reason, it is “one,” and that good is the final secret of the universe, which can be revealed only through logical inquiry.

According to Plato, good is an essential element of reality. Evil does not exist in itself but is, rather, an imperfect reflection of the real, which is good. In his Dialogues (first half of the 4th century bc) he maintains that human virtue lies in the fitness of a person to perform that person's proper function in the world. The human soul has three elements—intellect, will, and emotion—each of which possesses a specific virtue in the good person and performs a specific role. The virtue of intellect is wisdom, or knowledge of the ends of life; that of the will is courage, the capacity to act; and that of the emotions is temperance, or self-control. The ultimate virtue, justice, is the harmonious relation of all the others, each part of the soul doing its appropriate task and keeping its proper place. Plato maintained that the intellect should be sovereign, the will second, and the emotions subject to intellect and will. The just person, whose life is ordered in this way, is therefore the good person.

Aristotle, Plato's pupil, regarded happiness as the aim of life. In his principal work on ethics, the Nicomachean Ethics (late 4th century bc), he defined happiness as activity that accords with the specific nature of humanity; pleasure accompanies such activity but is not its chief aim. Happiness results from the unique human attribute of reason, functioning harmoniously with human faculties. Aristotle held that virtues are essentially good habits, and that to attain happiness a person must develop two kinds of habits: those of mental activity, such as knowledge, which lead to the highest human activity, contemplation; and those of practical action and emotion, such as courage. Moral virtues are habits of action that conform to the golden mean, the principle of moderation, and they must be flexible because of differences among people and conditioning factors. For example, the amount one should eat depends on one's size, age, and occupation. In general, Aristotle defines the mean as being between the two extremes of excess and insufficiency; thus, generosity is the mean between prodigality and stinginess. For Aristotle, the intellectual and the moral virtues are merely means toward the attainment of happiness, which results from the full realization of human potential.

VII

STOICISM

The philosophy of Stoicism developed about 300 bc, during the Hellenistic and Roman periods. In Greece the principal Stoic philosophers were Zeno of Citium, Cleanthes, and Chrysippus of Soli. In Rome, Stoicism proved to be the most popular of the Greek philosophies, and Cicero was among the famous Romans who came under its influence. Its principal figures during the Roman period were the Greek philosopher Epictetus and the Roman emperor and philosopher Marcus Aurelius. According to the Stoics, nature is orderly and rational, and only a life led in harmony with nature can be good. The Stoic philosophers, however, agreed also that because life is influenced by material circumstances one should try to be as independent of such circumstances as possible. The practice of certain cardinal virtues, such as practical wisdom, courage, discretion, and justice, enables one to achieve independence in the spirit of the Stoic motto “Endure and renounce.” Hence, the word stoic has come to mean fortitude in the face of hardship.

VIII

EPICUREANISM

In the 4th and 3rd centuries bc, the Greek philosopher Epicurus developed a system of thought, later called Epicureanism, which identified the highest good with pleasure, particularly intellectual pleasure, and, like Stoicism, advocated a temperate and even an ascetic life devoted to contemplative pursuits. The principal Roman exponent of Epicureanism was the poet and philosopher Lucretius, whose poem De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things), written in the middle of the 1st century bc, combined certain ideas derived from the cosmological doctrines of the Greek philosopher Democritus with others derived from the ethics of Epicurus. The Epicureans sought to achieve pleasure by maintaining a state of serenity—that is, by eliminating all emotional disturbances. They considered religious beliefs and practices harmful because they preoccupy one with disturbing thoughts of death and the uncertainty of life after death. The Epicureans also held that it is better to postpone immediate pleasure in order to attain more secure and lasting satisfaction in the future; they therefore insisted that the good life must be regulated by self-discipline.

IX

CHRISTIAN ETHICS

The ethical systems of the classical age were applied to the aristocracy, particularly in Greece. The same standards were not extended to non-Greeks, and the term for them, barbaroi (“barbarians”), acquired derogatory connotations. As for slaves, the attitude toward them can be summed up in Aristotle's characterization of a slave as a “living tool.” Partly for these reasons, as the pagan religions decayed, the contemporary philosophies did not gain any popular following, and much of the appeal of Christianity was its extension of moral citizenship to all, even to slaves.

The coming of Christianity marked a revolution in ethics, for it introduced a religious conception of good into Western thought. In the Christian view a person is totally dependent upon God and cannot achieve goodness by means of will or intelligence but only with the help of God's grace. The primary Christian ethical belief is stated in the golden rule, “So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them” (Matthew 7:12); in the injunctions to love one's neighbor as oneself (see Leviticus 19:18) and to love one's enemies (see Matthew 5:44); and in Jesus' saying, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's” (Matthew 22:21). Jesus believed that the essential meaning of Jewish law is in the commandment “you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself” (Luke 10:27).

Early Christianity emphasized as virtues asceticism, martyrdom, faith, mercy, forgiveness, and nonerotic love, few of which had been considered important by the philosophers of classical Greece and Rome.

X

ETHICS OF THE CHURCH FATHERS

One of the major shaping forces in Christian ethics was the competition with Manichaeism, a rival religion of Persian origin which held that good and evil (light and darkness) were opposite forces struggling for mastery. Manichaeism had an enormous following in the 3rd and 4th centuries ad. Saint Augustine, regarded as the founder of Christian theology, was originally a Manichaean but abandoned Manichaeism after being influenced by Platonic thought. After his conversion to Christianity in 387, he sought to integrate the Platonic view with the Christian concept of goodness as an attribute of God and sin as Adam's fall, from the guilt of which a person is redeemed by God's mercy. The Manichaean belief in evil persisted, however, as may be seen in Augustine's conviction of the sinfulness of human nature. This attitude may have reflected his own strong guilt over his youthful indiscretions and may account in part for the emphasis in early Christian moral doctrine on chastity and celibacy.

During the late Middle Ages Aristotle's works, made available through texts and commentaries prepared by Arab scholars, exerted a strong influence on European thinking. Because it emphasized empirical knowledge as opposed to revelation, Aristotelianism threatened the intellectual authority of the church. The Christian theologian Saint Thomas Aquinas succeeded in reconciling Aristotelianism with the authority of the church by acknowledging the truth of sense experience but holding it to be complementary to the truth of faith. The great intellectual authority of Aristotle was thus made to serve the authority of the church, and the Aristotelian logic was used to support the Augustinian concepts of original sin and redemption through divine grace. This synthesis is the substance of Aquinas's major work, Summa Theologica (1265-1273).

XI

ETHICS AND PENANCE

As the medieval church grew more powerful, a juridical system of ethics evolved, apportioning punishment for sin and reward for virtue in life after death. The most important virtues were humility, continence, benevolence, and obedience; inwardness, or goodness of spirit, was indispensable to morality. All actions, both good and bad, were graded by the church, and a system of temporal penance was instituted as atonement for sins.

The ethical beliefs of the medieval church received literary expression in The Divine Comedy by Dante, who was influenced by the philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas. In the section of The Divine Comedy called “Inferno,” Dante classifies sins under three main headings, each with a number of subdivisions. In increasing order of evil he places sins of incontinence (sensual or emotional sins); of violence or brutishness (sins of will); and of fraud or malice (sins of intellect). Plato's three faculties of the soul are repeated in their original order of importance, and the sins are regarded as corruptions in one or another of the three faculties.

XII

ETHICS AFTER THE REFORMATION

The influence of Christian ethical beliefs and practices diminished during the Renaissance. The Protestant Reformation effected a widespread return to basic principles within the Christian tradition, changing the emphasis on certain ideas and introducing new ones. According to Martin Luther, goodness of spirit is the essence of Christian piety. Moral conduct, or good works, is required of the Christian, but justification, or salvation, comes by faith alone. Luther himself married, and celibacy ceased to be required of the Protestant clergy.

The French Protestant theologian and religious reformer John Calvin accepted the theological doctrine that justification is by faith alone, and also upheld the Augustinian doctrine of original sin. The Puritans were Calvinists and adhered to Calvin's advocacy of sobriety, diligence, thrift, and lack of ostentation; they regarded contemplation as mere laziness, and poverty either as punishment for sin or evidence that one did not have God's grace. The Puritans believed that only the elect could expect salvation. They considered themselves elect but could not be sure unless they were given a sign. They believed their way of life was ethically correct and that it led to worldly prosperity. Prosperity was accepted as the sign. Goodness came to be associated with wealth, and poverty with evil; not to succeed in one's calling seemed to be clear indication that the approval of God was being withheld. The behavior that once was believed to lead to sanctity led the descendants of the Puritans to worldly wealth.

In general, during the Reformation, individual responsibility was considered more important than obedience to authority or tradition. This change of emphasis, which indirectly led to the development of modern secular ethics, is to be seen in the De Jure Belli et Pacis (The Law of War and Peace, 1625) by the Dutch jurist, theologian, and statesman Hugo Grotius. Although the work adheres to some of the doctrines of Saint Thomas Aquinas, it deals with people's political and civil duties in the spirit of ancient Roman law. Grotius argued that natural law is a part of divine law and is based on human nature, which exhibits a desire for peaceful association with others and a tendency to follow general principles in conduct. Therefore, society itself is properly based on natural law.

XIII

SECULAR ETHICAL PHILOSOPHIES

In his Leviathan (1651), the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes assigned greatest importance to organized society and political power. He argued that human life in the “state of nature” (apart from or before the institution of the civil state) is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” and that it is “a war of all against all.” Consequently, people seek security by entering into a social contract in which each person's original power is yielded to a sovereign, who regulates conduct.

This conservative position in politics assumes that human beings are evil and need a strong state to repress them. Nonetheless, Hobbes argued that if a sovereign does not provide security and order and is overthrown by the people, they revert to the state of nature and then may make a new contract. Hobbes's doctrine concerning the state and the social contract influenced the thought of the English philosopher John Locke. In his Two Treatises on Civil Government (1690) Locke maintained, however, that the purpose of the social contract is to reduce the absolute power of authority and to promote individual liberty.

Human reason is the criterion of right conduct in the system developed by the Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza. In his major work, Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata (1677; Ethics Demonstrated with Geometrical Order), Spinoza deduced ethics from psychology and psychology from metaphysics. He asserted that all things are morally neutral from the point of view of eternity; only human needs and interests determine what is considered good and evil, or right and wrong. Whatever aids humanity's knowledge of nature or is consonant with human reason is acknowledged as good. Since it is reasonable to suppose that whatever all people have in common is best for everyone, the good that people should seek for others is the good they desire for themselves. In addition, reason is needed in order to keep the passions in check and to achieve pleasure and happiness by avoiding pain. The highest human state, according to Spinoza, is the “intellectual love of God” derived from intuitive understanding, a faculty higher than ordinary reason. By the proper use of this faculty a person may contemplate the entire mental and physical universe and view it as comprising an infinite substance, which Spinoza terms God.

A

Newton's Laws

Most major scientific discoveries have affected ethics. The discoveries of Isaac Newton, the 17th-century English natural philosopher, provide one of the earliest and clearest examples of such an effect. Newton's laws were taken generally as evidence of a divine order that is rational. Contemporary thinking in this regard was expressed succinctly by the English poet Alexander Pope in the line, “God said, Let Newton be! and all was light.” Newton's discoveries caused philosophers to gain confidence in an ethical system as rational and orderly as nature was assumed to be.

B

Ethical Philosophies Before Darwinism

During the 18th century the British philosopher David Hume, in Essays Moral and Political (1741-1742), and Scottish philosopher Adam Smith, in his Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), formulated similarly subjective ethical systems. They identified the good with what evoked feelings of satisfaction and the bad with what evoked painful feelings. According to Hume and Smith, ideas of morality and public interest originate in the feelings of sympathy people bear toward one another even when not bound by kinship or other direct ties.

In Europe, the French philosopher and novelist Jean Jacques Rousseau, in his Social Contract (1762), accepted Hobbes's theory of a social contract. His novel Émile (1762) and other works, however, attributed evil to social maladjustments and held that humans were by nature good. The British anarchist, philosopher, novelist, and political economist William Godwin developed this idea to its logical extreme in his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice (1793), which rejected all social institutions, including that of the state, on the grounds that their mere existence is the source of evil.

A major contribution to ethics was made later in the century by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics, 1785). According to Kant, no matter how intelligently one acts, the results of human actions are subject to accident and circumstance; therefore, the morality of an act must not be judged by its consequence, but only by its motivation. Intention alone is good, for it leads a person to act, not from inclination, but from duty, which is based on a general principle that is right in itself. As the ultimate moral principle, Kant restates the golden rule in logical form, “Act as if the principle on which your action is based were to become by your will a universal law of nature.” This rule is called the categorical imperative, because it is unqualified and a command. Kant further insists that one must treat all others as “in every case an end, never as a means only.”

C

Utilitarianism

The ethical and political doctrine known as utilitarianism was formulated by the British philosopher Jeremy Bentham toward the end of the 18th century and later expounded by the British philosopher James Mill and his son, John Stuart Mill. In his Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), Bentham explained the principle of utility as a means of augmenting the happiness of the community. He believed that all human actions are motivated by a desire to obtain pleasure and avoid pain. Because utilitarianism is a universal hedonism, not an egoistic hedonism like Epicureanism, its highest good is the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people.

D

Hegelian Ethics

The German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, in his Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Foundations of the Philosophy of Right, 1821), accepted Kant's categorical imperative, but included it in a universal evolutionary theory in which all history is regarded as a series of stages leading toward the manifestation of a fundamental reality that is both spiritual and rational. Morality, according to Hegel, is not the result of a social contract, but a natural growth, arising in the family and culminating, historically, in the Prussian state of his time. “The history of the world,” he wrote, “is the discipline of the uncontrolled natural will, bringing it into obedience to a universal principle and conferring subjective freedom.”

The Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard reacted strongly against Hegel's system. In Either-Or (1843), Kierkegaard expressed his major ethical concern, the problem of choice. He believed that philosophical systems such as Hegel's obscure this crucial problem by making it seem an objective matter capable of a universal solution, rather than a subjective one that each person must confront individually. Kierkegaard's own choice was to live within the framework of Christian ethics. His emphasis on the necessity of choice influenced several philosophers associated with the movement known as existentialism, as well as a number of Christian and Jewish philosophers.

E

Ethics Since Darwin

The scientific development that most affected ethics after the time of Newton was the theory of evolution advanced by Charles Darwin. Darwin's findings provided documentary support for the system, sometimes termed evolutionary ethics, propounded by the British philosopher Herbert Spencer, according to whom morality is merely the result of certain habits acquired by humanity in the course of evolution. A startling but logical elaboration of the Darwinian thesis that survival of the fittest is a basic law of nature was advanced by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, who held that so-called moral conduct is necessary only for the weak. Moral conduct—especially such as was advocated in Jewish and Christian ethics, which in his view is a slave ethic—tends to allow the weak to inhibit the self-realization of the strong. According to Nietzsche, every action should be directed toward the development of the superior individual, or Übermensch (“superman”), who will be able to realize the most noble possibilities of life. Nietzsche found this ideal individual best exemplified in the persons of ancient Greek philosophers before Plato and of military dictators such as Julius Caesar and Napoleon.

In opposition to the concept of ruthless and unremitting struggle as the basic law of nature, the Russian social reformer and philosopher Prince Pyotr Kropotkin, among others, presented studies of animal behavior in nature demonstrating mutual aid. Kropotkin asserted that the survival of species is furthered by mutual aid and that humans have attained primacy among animals in the course of evolution through their capacity for cooperation. Kropotkin expounded his ideas in a number of works, among them Mutual Aid, A Factor in Evolution (1890-1902) and Ethics, Origin and Development (posthumously published, 1924). In the belief that governments are based on force and that if they are eliminated the cooperative instincts of people would spontaneously lead to a cooperative order, Kropotkin advocated anarchism.

Anthropologists applied evolutionary principles to the study of human societies and cultures. These studies reemphasized the different concepts of right and wrong held by different societies; therefore, it was believed, most such concepts had a relative rather than universal validity. Outstanding among ethical concepts based on an anthropological approach are those of the Finnish anthropologist Edvard A. Westermarck in Ethical Relativity (1932).

XIV

PSYCHOANALYSIS AND BEHAVIORISM

Modern ethics is profoundly affected by the psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud and his followers and the behaviorist doctrines based on the conditioned-reflex discoveries of the Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Freud attributed the problem of good and evil in each individual to the struggle between the drive of the instinctual self to satisfy all its desires and the necessity of the social self to control or repress most of these impulses in order for the individual to function in society. Although Freud's influence has not been assimilated completely into ethical thinking, Freudian depth psychology has shown that guilt, often sexual, underlies much thinking about good and evil.

Behaviorism, through observation of animal behavior, strengthened beliefs in the power to change human nature by arranging conditions favorable to the desired changes. In the 1920s, behaviorism was broadly accepted in the United States, principally in theories of pediatrics and infant training and education in general. The greatest influence, however, was on thinking in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. There, the so-called new Soviet citizen was developed according to behaviorist principles through the conditioning power of the rigidly controlled Soviet society. Soviet ethics defined good as whatever is favorable to the state and bad as everything opposed to it.

In his late 19th-century and early 20th-century writings, the American philosopher and psychologist William James anticipated Freud and Pavlov to some extent. James is best known as the founder of pragmatism, which maintains that the value of ideas is determined by their consequences. His greatest contribution to ethical theory, however, lies in his insistence on the importance of interrelationships, in ideas as in other phenomena.

XV

RECENT TRENDS

The British philosopher Bertrand Russell has influenced ethical thinking in recent decades. A vigorous critic of conventional morality, he held the view that moral judgments express individual desires or accepted habits. In his thinking, both the ascetic saint and the detached sage are poor human models because they are incomplete human beings. Complete human beings participate fully in the life of society and express all of their nature. Some impulses must be checked in the interests of society and others in the interest of individual development, but it is a person's relatively unimpeded natural growth and self-realization that makes for the good life and harmonious society.

A number of 20th-century philosophers, some of whom have espoused the theories of existentialism, have been concerned with the problems of individual ethical choice raised by Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. The orientation of some of these thinkers is religious, as was that of the Russian philosopher Nikolay Aleksandrovich Berdyayev, who emphasized freedom of the individual spirit; of the Austrian-Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, who was concerned with the morality of relations between individuals; of the German American Protestant theologian Paul Tillich, who stressed the courage to be oneself; and of the French Catholic philosopher and dramatist Gabriel Marcel and the German Protestant philosopher and psychiatrist Karl Jaspers, both of whom were concerned with the uniqueness of the individual and the importance of communication between individuals. A different tendency in modern ethical thought characterizes the writings of the French philosophers Jacques Maritain and Étienne Gilson, who followed the tradition of Thomas Aquinas. According to Maritain, “true existentialism” belongs only to this tradition.

Certain other modern philosophers do not accept any of the traditional religions. The German philosopher Martin Heidegger maintains that no God exists, although one may come into being in the future. Human beings are, therefore, alone in the universe and must make their ethical decisions with the constant awareness of death. The French philosopher and novelist Jean-Paul Sartre was an atheist who also emphasized the awareness of death. Sartre also maintained that people have an ethical responsibility to involve themselves in the social and political activities of their time.

Several other modern philosophers, such as the American John Dewey, have been concerned with ethical thought from the viewpoint of instrumentalism. According to Dewey, the good is that which is chosen after reflecting upon both the means and the probable consequences of realizing the good. Contemporary philosophical discussion of ethics in England and the United States is largely based on the writings of George Edward Moore, especially his Principia Ethica. Moore argued that ethical terms are definable in terms of the word good, whereas “good” is undefinable. This is so because goodness is a simple, unanalyzable quality. Philosophers who disagree with Moore in this regard, and who believe good to be definable, are termed naturalists. Moore is called an intuitionist. Naturalists and intuitionists regard ethical sentences as descriptive of the world, and hence true or false. Philosophers who disagree with this belong to a third major school, noncognitivism, in which ethics is not a form of knowledge, and ethical language is not descriptive. An important branch of the noncognitive school is logical empiricism, which questions the validity of ethical statements as compared with statements of fact or of logic. Some logical empiricists argue that ethical statements have only emotional or persuasive significance. Other contemporary American philosophers writing to indicate a concern with ethical considerations are Sidney Hook in his Human Values and Economic Policy (1967) and Mortimer Adler in The Conditions of Philosophy (1965).

Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2008. © 1993-2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

BEING OPTMISTIC IN LIFE

BEING OPTIMISTIC

Be so strong that nothing can disturb your peace of mind. Talk health, happiness, and prosperity to every person you meet.

Appreciate all your friends’ good qualities and strengths. Look at the sunny side of everything. Think only of the best, work only for the best and expect only the best. Be enthusiastic about the success of others as you are about your own.

Forget the mistake of the past and press on to the greater achievements of the future. Give everyone a smile spend so much time improving yourself that you have no time to criticize others.

[BE TOO BIG FOR WORRY AND TOO NOBLE FOR ANGER]

EIGHT STEPS TO POSITIVE ATTITUDE

STEP 1: CHANGE FOCUS, LOOK FOR THE POSITIVE

Start looking for what is right in a person or situation instead of looking for what is wrong.

STEP 2: MAKE A HABIT OF DOING IT NOW Procrastinations lead to negative attitude. The habit of procrastination fatigues you more than the effort it takes to do it.

STEP 3: DEVELOP AN ATTITUDE OF GRATITUDE Count your blessings, not your troubles. Take time to smell the roses. Attitude of gratitude does not mean complacency.

STEP 4: GET INTO A CONTINUOUS EDUCATION PROGRAM

Intellectual education influences the head and values-based education influences the heart. Knowledge is potential power; wisdom is real power. Sharpen your axe and feed your mind.

STEP 5: BUILD A POSITIVE SELF-ESTEEM. When we feel good within, our performance goes up and our relationships improve both at home and at work.

STEP 6: STAY AWAY FROM NEGATIVE INFLUENCES

STEP 7: LEARN TO LIKE THE THINGS THAT NEED TO BE DONE. Do what is necessary, then what is possible and suddenly you are doing the impossible.

STEP 8: START YOUR DAY WITH SOMETHING POSITIVE

Read or listen to something positive first thing in the morning